Your Cleanest Dirty Shirt

Hmm. CNN was chattering in the background when I heard the very smart, very astute Mohamed El-Erian explain the reason why investors continue to purchase US bonds even though the United States’ credit rating was downgraded recently. He called it “Your Cleanest Dirty Shirt” which is akin to something along the lines of “where else can they go?”. Here is the explanation:

You are on a business trip. It is extended longer than you anticipated and you are out of clean shirts. What to do? You wear your cleanest dirty shirt.

So, how does this work in the legal profession? Well, for one thing, that client that is determined to win everything may end up without a shirt if s/he persists in a winner take all strategy. By convincing your client that s/he may have to wear the cleanest dirty shirt, i.e., that newly maligned word “compromise”, your client may not win everything, but will come out of the process with a shirt on his or her back. It may not smell right, but wearing your cleanest dirty shirt is the smart thing to do.

Comments

Spectacularly Stupid Statements

I’ve been out of law school so long that I really do not know what’s going on in those Ivory Towers. My friend, Chuck Newton, by contrast, really pays attention to such things. He has one daughter, fresh out of law school and a newly minted attorney, and two other children about to enter law school. Chuck could probably tell you the cost of tuition for every law school in the country and its bar pass rate. I’ll defer to him on such matters as getting the best bang for your buck on the law school scene.

What I do know a little about is creating your own opportunity. I know that Chuck agrees with me here. He has written extensively on the subject. Lawyers just cannot expect to hang a shingle, or build that better mouse trap or whatever, and have their dance card filled for all eternity. It just doesn’t work that way.

Whether you are building a law practice, trying to hang onto a job, or just living your life, its always a constant struggle to create that next opportunity and assumptions can be dangerous, especially if you think you deserve success simply because you showed up at the party.

For example, I have a childhood friend. Many years ago she went through a divorce and suddenly found herself the single mother of two young children. One night, while listening to her woe over glasses of wine she blurted out, “remember when we were growing up and we were told that we would get married and be taken care of for the rest of our lives?” As gently as I could, I told her that no I didn’t remember that. Secretly, what I remember being told was that even if I did marry someone who could support me, something could happen. Like — he might get hit by a bus and I’d have to support myself, I’d have to support my husband and our family, and I’d have to pay all my husband’s medical bills. In other words, my parents wanted me to be prepared for any eventuality.

Read More...
Comments

Dear (Contact First Name)

Last week I received an email from an organization which is trying to sell its certification program to e-discovery lawyers. This may or may not be a good idea. I really don’t know enough about it to form an opinion.

What I do know is that most lawyers are desperate to sell their services. They glob onto just about anything. New SEO experts, dress-for-success consultants, law specialty boot camps, and certifications in areas of the law that did not exist five years ago.

On the other hand, maybe I am just a tad cynical. It’s not just airport security screeners that are invasive:

Fairly recently, a prospective attorney-client asked to see a copy of my law school transcripts from twenty-eight years ago. Without skipping beat, I told her that my work product spoke for itself; she could read my writing samples, she could talk with my attorney-clients, but I wasn’t going to produce my law school transcripts, especially since I would have to order them from my law school as I no longer have a copy. Needless to say, the conversation ended quickly after my refusal to produce.

There is a fine line, however, between being too personal and not personal enough.

For example, take that email from the organization trying to sell its certification program. It was addressed to “Dear (Contact First Name)”. Not the most effective marketing strategy, especially from an organization touting itself as on the cutting edge of anything having to do with electronic communication.

The bottom line is (I just started reusing that phrase from my 1970s B-school days), if you are going to market your services, whether it is an email blast or a face-to-face contact, get the person’s name correct, or don’t use a name at all. You can always refer to another lawyer as “Counselor”, a prospective client as “Neighbor”, or as John McCain, and now Mitt Romney addresses audiences, “My Friends”.

Comments

R-E-S-P-E-C-T, Find Out What It Means To Me

During last year’s State of Union Address, a congressman shouts out, “you lie”, while the president of the United States is speaking. More than one-half of a political party refuse to accept the president as a legitimate president because, contrary to all reason, they are convinced that he was not born on American soil. And now, the opposition is prepared to destroy the world’s economy simply because it thinks it can use that to score points in the next election cycle. Something is profoundly wrong.

Have these people become unhinged because President Obama is a person of color? I don’t think so.

I remember long before anyone ever heard of Monica Lewinsky the bumper stickers in California’s Central Valley, “Impeach Clinton — Better Yet, Get a Rope”. Given our history of political assassinations, it turned my stomach.

This is a far cry from the way I was raised.

When I was growing up in the 1950s and 1960s, my immediate family took my paternal grandparents out to dinner every Sunday afternoon. It was before the advent of freeways and superhighways and the oneway drive to their home from ours was almost two hours.

My grandmother kept a very orderly house. For example, the magazines on her coffee table were kept in alphabetical order and sorted according to date. I used to sit in her living room, fantasizing in Oscar Madison fashion, of picking them up and throwing them against the wall. Of course, I didn’t. It was their house. My grandfather, a barber, worked six days a week, twelve hours a day, for fifty years; I understood that they had earned the right to live a structured life even though I wanted to wear flowers in my hair.

Lately, I’ve been thinking a lot about my grandparent’s bedroom. It was very small, so there wasn’t a whole lot of room for furniture.

Read More...
Comments

They're Coming To Take Me Away, Ha-Haaa!

If you did not come of age during the 1960s, you will not remember this two week hit by the artist known as Napoleon XIV, nor will you remember the flip side, "!aaaH-aH ,yawA eM ekaT oT gnimoC er'yehT", which was the song recorded backwards, or the sequel by Josephine XV, “I’m Glad They Took You Away, Ha-Haaa!”. Quel dommage!

I point this out, not because it has anything to do with the practice of law, at least I don’t think it does, but because I just had a flash from the past. Time to stop watching the news!

Comments